Appeal 11361

Appeal Summary

Status: Decision Rendered - Reconsideration of ID 11212

Appeal ID: 11361

Submission Date: 12/7/14 1:35 PM

Hearing Date: 12/10/14

Case #: B-010

Appeal Type: Building

Project Type: commercial

Building/Business Name: Clay Street Associates LLC

Appeal Involves: Erection of a new structure

Proposed use: Multi-Family Residential

Project Address: 1500-1520 SW 12th Ave

Appellant Name: Walter Currin

LUR or Permit Application #: Permit 14-170294-CO

Stories: 8 Occupancy: R-2 Construction Type: I-B

Fire Sprinklers: Yes - Fully sprinklered per NFPA 13

Plans Examiner/Inspector: Jody Orrison

Plan Submitted Option: pdf   [File 1]

Payment Option: electronic

Appeal Information Sheet

Appeal item 1

Code Section

1207.2 AIR-BORUNE SOUND, 1207.3 STRUCTURE-BORUNE SOUND

Requires

1207.2 - Walls, partitions and floor/ceiling assemblies separating dwelling units from each other or from public service areas shall have a sound transmission class (STC) of not less than 50 (45 if field tested) for air-borne noise when tested in accordance with ASTM E 90.

1207.3 – Floor/ceiling assemblies between dwelling units or between dwelling units and a public or service area within the structure shall have an impact insulation class (IIC) of not less than 50 (45 if field tested) when tested in accordance with ASTM E 492.

Code Modification or Alternate Requested
Proposed Design

Proposed floor/ceiling assembly Type A would consist of: (2) layers type X gypsum board, 7/8 inch metal hat channel at 24-inches on center, 12-inch deep composite metal joist, topped with 3-1/2-inches of regular weight concrete and a finished floor.

Type C floor/ceiling assembly is the same as Type A, except adds the following suspended from the ceiling: (1) layer type X gypsum board, suspended the assembly above with a concealed grid and 3-1/2 inches of acoustic batt insulation.

Reason for alternative

While the baseline assembly of UL G524 (3-1/2-inch concrete, min. 12 deep metal joist, 7/8-inch furring channel, and 1/2-inch type C GWB) achieves the required fire rating, it is projected that it would be acoustically inadequate to meet code minimums.

The proposed assembly uses more GWB than the baseline assembly in order to control noise transmission—the proposed assembly uses (2) layers of 5/8” Type ‘X’ GWB rather than (1) layer of ½”Type ‘C’ GWB. By including a greater mass of GWB within the assembly, the assembly achieves the required acoustic performance, and provides equal or superior fire protection of the baseline assembly.

Appeal Decision

Sound ratings per engineered analysis: Granted as proposed.

The Administrative Appeal Board finds that the information submitted by the appellant demonstrates that the approved modifications or alternate methods are consistent with the intent of the code; do not lessen health, safety, accessibility, life, fire safety or structural requirements; and that special conditions unique to this project make strict application of those code sections impractical.