Appeal 14862
Appeal Summary
Status: Decision Rendered - Held over from ID 14823 (3/22/17) for more information
Appeal ID: 14862
Submission Date: 3/27/17 8:42 AM
Hearing Date: 3/29/17
Case #: B-021
Appeal Type: Building
Project Type: commercial
Building/Business Name: PDX Commons
Appeal Involves: Erection of a new structure
Proposed use: Residential
Project Address: 4262 SE Belmont St
Appellant Name: Edward Cronin
LUR or Permit Application #: Permit 15-215002-CO
Stories: 4 Occupancy: R-2, A-3, B, M, S-1, S-2 Construction Type: V-A and I-A
Fire Sprinklers: Yes - Throughout
Plans Examiner/Inspector: Brian McCall
Plan Submitted Option: pdf [File 1] [File 2] [File 3] [File 4] [File 5] [File 6]
Payment Option: mail
Appeal Information Sheet
Appeal item 1
| Code Section | 602 – Construction Classification |
|---|---|
| Requires | 602.1 General. 602.2 Types I & II From Table 601. Type IIB Construction |
| Code Modification or Alternate Requested | |
| Proposed Design | The proposed design is to amend the existing construction classification from Type VA/IA to Type IIB/IA. The proposed building is built out of non-combustible materials; a combination of metal framing, metal decking, concrete. The proposed design contains three elements that would be considered deficiencies as a Type IIB building; 1.Stairs 1, 2 & 3. 2.Egress balcony on levels 2,3,4 3.Common Great Room Structure. Please refer to g0.02a, g0.04 & g0.04 – Proposed, for the Type II-B code summary sheet and life safety egress plans. The existing code summary sheet and life safety egress plans have also been attached for convenience. |
| Reason for alternative | The building is currently under construction and was approved as a Type VA building, despite the fact that the building is constructed with metal framing above the Type I podium. The proposed design is requested per a correction notice from the inspector sighting the lack of continuity at the 1hr fire partitioned walls and 1hr load bearing walls within the rated ceiling assembly cavity as Type VA construction classification. The plans examiner noted that a detail for an appropriate alternative was required as per 704.3 & 708.4 that differs from the detail as designed and approved. The installed metal joists are already load bearing and accomplishing the continuity requirements is unachievable. Subsequently, the Type IIB classification lends itself to this building’s actual construction method, given the decision to provide a more durable building and to build a Type VA building out of non-combustible materials. The elements noted above which have been built out of combustible materials are either encased within a 2 hour fire barrier shaft, or demonstrate a at least a 1hr fire resistance equivalency as granted in a previous appeal or as noted above and provided for within the code for heavy timber members. |
Appeal item 2
| Code Section | 708.4 – Continuity |
|---|---|
| Requires | Fire partitions shall extend form the top of the foundation or floor/ceiling assembly below to the underside of the floor or roof sheathing, slab or deck above or to the fire-resistance-rated floor/ceiling or roof/ceiling assembly above, and shall be securely attached thereto. In combustible construction where the fire partitions are not required to be continuous to the sheathing, deck or slab, the space between the ceiling and the sheathing, deck or slab above shall be fire-blocked or draft stopped in accordance with Sections 718.3 at the partition line. The supporting construction shall be protected to afford the required fire-resistance rating of the wall supported, except for walls separating tenant spaces in covered and open mall buildings, walls separating dwelling units, walls separating sleeping units and corridor walls, in buildings of Type IIB, IIB and VB construction. |
| Code Modification or Alternate Requested | |
| Proposed Design | The proposed design is to provide an alternate method for the continuation of individually encasing the 1hr fire partition that separates dwelling units, at the intersection of the horizontal assembly and wall. The alternate method to running type X gypsum board to the underside of the floor/roof decking is: a. Demising Walls (1hr Fire Partitions); To continue the type X gypsum wall board of the interior wall assembly (UL 425) to the underside of the metal deck via fire taped and finished joint as best as possible, keying around the already installed metal C joists and infilling the rim track. Where the perpendicular C joist penetrates the wall assembly, 4” Semi-Rigid Mineral Wool Insulation will be securely fitted within the depth of the joist to provide continuity at the penetration. All penetrations through the membrane will be fire caulked in accordance with Section 714. Please refer to SKA 0.82a The construction type is IIB. Walls to receive this detail are on the second, third and fourth floor, 1 hr fire partitions between individual unit dwellings. Please refer to g0.02, g0.04 & g0.05 – Proposed, for specific locations. Please also refer to 0.82a for a specific detail. |
| Reason for alternative | The proposed design is requested per a correction notice from the inspector sighting the lack of continuity at the 1hr fire partitioned walls within the ceiling assembly cavity. The plans examiner noted that a detail for an appropriate alternative was required as per 708.4. The demising walls cannot be corrected with the continuous gypsum wall board layer to the underside of the metal decking since the structural rim joist is already taking loads from the floor decking and topping slab; correction would require removal of the rim joist. Due to this as-built condition, an alternative solution is required to provide continuity of the individual encasement to the demising wall The proposed design provides equivalent fire protection for the encasement of the load bearing wall for the following reasons:
|
Appeal item 3
| Code Section | 711.4 Continuity |
|---|---|
| Requires | Assemblies shall be continuous without openings, penetrations or joints except as permitted by this section and Sections 712.1, 714.4, 715. 1009.3 and 1022.1. Skylights and other penetrations through a fire-resistance-rated roof deck or slab are permitted to be unprotected, provided that the structural integrity of the fire-resistance-rated roof assembly is maintained. Unprotected skylights shall not be permitted in roof assemblies required to be fire-resistance rated in accordance with Section 705.8.6. The supporting construction shall be protected to afford the required fire-resistance rating of the horizontal assembly supported. |
| Code Modification or Alternate Requested | |
| Proposed Design | The proposed design is to provide an alternate method for maintaining continuity of the 1 hr fire rated horizontal assemblies at the load bearing walls and interior non-rated wall partitions within the individual dwelling units. The alternate method to running the interior gypsum wall board to the underside of the metal joist is: To terminate the interior gypsum wall board of the wall assembly at the horizontal membrane of the fire rated/floor ceiling assembly (UL G551 & UL G553) via fire taped and finished joint, and to friction fit 4” Semi-Rigid Mineral Wool Insulation (mechanically fastened to maintain its position and durability) in line with the ceiling membrane, fit between at the O.C spacing between the vertical studs, and to be run continuously as possible. Where the horizontal assembly is at a different level, 2” of Semi-Rigid Mineral Wool Insulation will be installed continuously from the top track of the wall to the top of the lower horizontal membrane, to ensure fire protection is maintained. The construction type is IIB. Horizontal assemblies to receive this detail are C-2 and C-6 (UL G551 & UL G553) where internal unit partitions interrupt the horizontal assembly on the second, third and fourth floor. Please refer to g0.02, g0.04 & g0.05 - Proposed attached key plan for specific locations. Please also refer to SKA 0.79-0.85 for specific details. |
| Reason for alternative | The proposed design is requested per a correction notice from the inspector sighting the lack of continuity at the horizontal assembly. The plans examiner noted that a detail for a load bearing wall and a non-load bearing partition wall penetration at the horizontal assembly for the condition was required in accordance with 711.4 – Continuity. The C-2 ceiling type rim joist, exterior wall and ceiling are installed per the approved structural and architectural drawings, and referenced test assemblies. The load bearing walls and interior partition walls cannot be corrected with the continuous gypsum wall board layer to the underside of the metal joist as the ceiling grid and metal stud wall is already installed; correction would require removal of the significant ceiling grid and stud wall. Due to this as-built condition, an alternative solution is required to provide continuity of the fire rated horizontal assembly. The proposed design provides equivalent fire protection at the wall to floor intersection joint without a fire tested assembly for the following reasons:
|
Appeal item 4
| Code Section | 704.3 – Protection of the Primary Structural Frame Other Than Columns |
|---|---|
| Requires | Members of the primary structural frame other than columns that are required to have protection to achieve a fire-resistance rating and support more than two floors or one floor and roof, or support load-bearing wall or a non load-bearing wall more than two stories high, shall be provided individual encasement protection by protecting them on all side for the full length, including connections to other structural members, with materials having the required fire-resistance rating. From Table 601. Type VA Construction interior bearing walls are required to be 1 hr rated. |
| Code Modification or Alternate Requested | |
| Proposed Design | As an alternate to appeal item #1, the proposed design is to provide an alternate method for the continuation of individually encasing the 1hr fire rated load bearing walls at the intersection of the horizontal assembly and wall. The alternate method to running type X gypsum board to the underside of the floor/roof decking is: a. Interior Load Bearing Walls & Demising Walls (1hr Fire Partitions); To continue the type X gypsum wall board of the interior wall assembly (UL 425) to the underside of the metal deck via fire taped and finished joint as best as possible, keying around the already installed metal C joists and infilling the rim track. Where the perpendicular C joist penetrates the wall assembly, 4” Semi-Rigid Mineral Wool Insulation will be friction fitted within the depth of the joist to provide continuity at the penetration. The construction type is VA. Walls to receive this detail are on the second, third and fourth floor, 1 hr fire rated, load-bearing, and located within individual unit dwellings or are located at demising walls between individual unit dwellings. Please refer to g0.02, g0.04 & g0.05 - Existing attached key plan for specific locations. Please also refer to SKA 0.79-0.87 for specific details. |
| Reason for alternative | The proposed design is requested per a correction notice from the inspector sighting the lack of individual protection to the load bearing walls within the ceiling assembly cavity. The plans examiner noted that a detail for an appropriate alternative encasement method for load bearing partition walls was required as per 704.3. The C-2 ceiling type rim joist, exterior wall and ceiling are installed per the approved structural and architectural drawings, and referenced test assemblies. The interior load bearing walls cannot be corrected with the continuous gypsum wall board layer to the underside of the metal decking since the structural rim joist is already taking loads from the floor decking and topping slab; correction would require removal of the rim joist. Due to this as-built condition, an alternative solution is required to provide continuity of the individual encasement to the load bearing wall. The proposed design provides equivalent fire protection for the encasement of the load bearing wall for the following reasons:
|
Appeal Decision
1. Amend the proposed construction classification from Type VA / IA to Type IIB / IA: Granted for construction type change only. Plan revision will be required to confirm all conditions of IIB construction are met. Elements noted as deficiencies will require separate appeals.
2. Fire partitions continuity from floor/ceiling assembly below to the underside of the floor or roof sheathing, slab or deck above: Denied. Proposal does not provide equivalent life safety protection.
3. Continuity of horizontal assemblies: Denied. Proposal does not provide equivalent life safety protection.
4. Protection of the Primary Structural Frame Other Than Columns: Denied. Proposal does not provide equivalent life safety protection.
Appellant may contact Mitch Nickolds (503-823-1054) for additional information.
For the item granted, the Administrative Appeal Board finds that the information submitted by the appellant demonstrates that the approved modifications or alternate methods are consistent with the intent of the code; do not lessen health, safety, accessibility, life, fire safety or structural requirements; and that special conditions unique to this project make strict application of those code sections impractical.
Pursuant to City Code Chapter 24.10, you may appeal this decision to the Building Code Board of Appeal within 180 calendar days of the date this decision is published. For information on the appeals process and costs, including forms, appeal fee, payment methods and fee waivers, go to www.portlandoregon.gov/bds/appealsinfo, call (503) 823-7300 or come in to the Development Services Center.