Appeal 20797
Appeal Summary
Status: Decision Rendered
Appeal ID: 20797
Submission Date: 8/22/19 5:00 PM
Hearing Date: 8/28/19
Case #: B-007
Appeal Type: Building
Project Type: commercial
Building/Business Name: Broadstone Anthem
Appeal Involves: Erection of a new structure
Proposed use: Apartments
Project Address: 1337 E Burnside St
Appellant Name: Blair Stone
LUR or Permit Application #: Permit 17-240808-CO
Stories: 6 Occupancy: R-2, M, A-2, S-2 Construction Type: III-A over I-A
Fire Sprinklers: Yes - Throughout
Plans Examiner/Inspector: Chanel Horn, Corey Stanley
Plan Submitted Option: pdf [File 1]
Payment Option: electronic
Appeal Information Sheet
Appeal item 1
| Code Section | 703.2, 703.3 |
|---|---|
| Requires | Code Section 703.2 The fire resistance rating of building elements, components or assemblies shall be determined in accordance with the test procedures set forth in ASTM E119 or UL 263 or in accordance with Section 703.3. Where materials, systems or devices that have not been tested as part of a fire- resistance-rated assembly are incorporated into the building element, component, or assembly, sufficient data shall be made available to the building official to show that the required fire-resistance rating is not reduced. Materials and methods of construction used to protect joints and penetrations in fire-resistance-rated building elements, components or assemblies shall not reduce the required fire- resistance rating.
|
| Code Modification or Alternate Requested | |
| Proposed Design | Also see attached PDF with drawings and FPE report. The code requires that primary structural members have a fire resistance rating provided by the individual encasement or alternative method. The 1337 E. Burnside project has steel beams and columns at Level 2, supporting the Type III-A construction above. The proposed condition replaces the fire-rated gypsum wrapped assemblies at beams and columns in the indicated locations with spray-applied fire resistive materials (SFRM) to the minimum thicknesses recommended by the manufacturer. The beams indicated in plan demonstrate two conditions, at exterior perimeter bearing walls with a 2-hour fire resistance requirement, and as interior primary structural framing with a 1-hour fire resistance requirement per OSSC 2014, Table 601. |
| Reason for alternative | We are requesting this appeal because it is a standard industry practice to determine SFRM thicknesses of wide flange beams based on steel column calculation resulting in a more conservative methodology. SFRM protection at the steel beam and column locations will simplify the plane of the finished ceiling and provide a slight addition of height to room below. |
Appeal Decision
Alternate 1 and 2 hour beam assemblies with enginering analysis: Granted as proposed.
The Administrative Appeal Board finds that the information submitted by the appellant demonstrates that the approved modifications or alternate methods are consistent with the intent of the code; do not lessen health, safety, accessibility, life, fire safety or structural requirements; and that special conditions unique to this project make strict application of those code sections impractical.
Pursuant to City Code Chapter 24.10, you may appeal this decision to the Building Code Board of Appeal within 90 calendar days of the date this decision is published. For information on the appeals process, go to www.portlandoregon.gov/bds/appealsinfo, call (503) 823-7300 or come in to the Development Services Center.