APPEAL SUMMARY
Status: Decision Rendered | |
Appeal ID: 23703 | Project Address: 234 SE Grand Ave |
Hearing Date: 5/6/20 | Appellant Name: Tom Jaleski |
Case No.: B-008 | |
Appeal Type: Building | Plans Examiner/Inspector: Corey Stanley, Jody Orrison |
Project Type: commercial | Stories: 8 Occupancy: B & S-2 Construction Type: IV-B |
Building/Business Name: Flatworks Building | Fire Sprinklers: Yes - Fully sprinkler-protected |
Appeal Involves: Erection of a new structure | LUR or Permit Application No.: |
Plan Submitted Option: pdf [File 1] [File 2] | Proposed use: Office with parking below |
APPEAL INFORMATION SHEET
Appeal item 1
Code Section | OSSC Appendix P604.2.2.3 |
Requires | P602.4.2.2.2 Protected area. All interior faces of all mass timber elements shall be protected in accordance with Section P602.4.2.2.1, including the inside face of exterior mass timber walls and mass timber roofs. Exceptions: Unprotected portions of mass timber ceilings and walls complying with Section P602.4.2.2.4 and the following:
|
Code Modification or Alternate Requested | The proposed 8 story Type IV-B building will include exposed mass timber ceiling including beams based on enhancements to sprinkler density, coverage area, and water supply reliability to satisfy the intent of the code by alternate means. |
Proposed Design | The proposed 8-story 103-ft mass timber building will meet all of the requirements for Type IV-B construction except that the exposed surface area of the ceilings and beams will exceed the 20 percent allowed by Section P604.2.2.3. The mass timber ceiling, including the beams, is proposed to be fully exposed. Equivalent protection will be provided by the following: |
Reason for alternative | Refer to the attached report, stamped by Oregon Registered Fire Protection Engineer, for the justification for the alternate proposal. The additional automatic sprinkler protection and other features proposed in this report are at least equivalent in safety and reliability to the limitations on exposed ceiling area for Type IV-B construction and as such satisfy the intent of the code. The design team has also engaged a peer reviewer as recommended by the city during the pre-app meeting. WJE, the peer reviewer selected for this project, has provided their evaluation of the design strategy and reviewed the report. Find their letter of support for the proposed elements of the design. Therefore, based on the non-combustible vertical structural members, non-combustible walls including attached columns, enhancements to sprinkler density, coverage area, and water supply reliability, we seek approval of the proposed conditions consistent with the authority granted to the building official by OSSC Section 104.11. |
APPEAL DECISION
Alternate means of providing protection for fully exposed mass timber ceiling: Granted as proposed.
The Administrative Appeal Board finds that the information submitted by the appellant demonstrates that the approved modifications or alternate methods are consistent with the intent of the code; do not lessen health, safety, accessibility, life, fire safety or structural requirements; and that special conditions unique to this project make strict application of those code sections impractical.
Pursuant to City Code Chapter 24.10, you may appeal this decision to the Building Code Board of Appeal within 90 calendar days of the date this decision is published. For information on the appeals process, go to www.portlandoregon.gov/bds/appealsinfo, call (503) 823-7300 or come in to the Development Services Center.