Appeal 23872
Appeal Summary
Status: Hold for Additional Information - Reconsideration of ID 23758
Appeal ID: 23872
Submission Date: 7/1/20 6:22 PM
Hearing Date: 7/8/20
Case #: B-007
Appeal Type: Building
Project Type: commercial
Building/Business Name: LBRB
Appeal Involves: Alteration of an existing structure,Reconsideration of appeal
Proposed use: Biomedical Research Laboratory
Project Address: 3215 SW Pavilion Loop
Appellant Name: Tom Jaleski
LUR or Permit Application #: Preliminary
Stories: 11 Occupancy: B Construction Type: I-A
Fire Sprinklers: Yes - Throughout
Plans Examiner/Inspector: Jim Zarr
Plan Submitted Option: pdf [File 1] [File 2] [File 3] [File 4]
Payment Option: electronic
Appeal Information Sheet
Appeal item 1
| Code Section | 2019 OFC Table 3804.1.1 |
|---|---|
| Requires | Original Appeal Text:
Reconsideration Text: |
| Code Modification or Alternate Requested | Original Appeal Text: Reconsideration Text: |
| Proposed Design | Original Appeal Text: Reconsideration Text: The proposed design will follow all the requirements of 2019 OFC Table 3804.1.1 for the design of laboratory suites and the percentage of maximum allowable quantities of hazardous materials in laboratory suites, except that the third level (LBRB B2) will be considered the first story above grade plane while determining the limits of MAQ per lab suite and the number of lab suites per floor. The proposed alternate approach is based on the following protection/considerations: |
| Reason for alternative | Original Appeal Text: Reconsideration Text: We understand that the city raised concerns with the language of the initial appeal, where the request was to modify the story definition for the building. They felt that the appeal did not fully address why this was required and therefore were hesitant on granting this without fully understanding the potential implications this could have for the building. Per the follow up discussion with the Building Official and Fire Marshall, it was suggested to appeal instead for the MAQ allowance per 2019 OFC Table 3804.1.1. The appeal reconsideration is requested as part of the effort of the design team to review the existing conditions, evaluate chemical use and make sure this is in compliance with the current codes. This effort includes providing limits on the use and storage of hazardous materials quantities per the allowance of laboratory suite for each floor level following the 2019 OFC Section 3804. Table 3804.1.1 details the chemical storage per floor and provides limitations on the higher floors. This is based on the floor above or grade plane. As the LBRB building is located on a steep site, the building prescriptively is classifying based on the lowest floor in relation to the surrounding grade – thereby classify LBRB B4 as the first story above grade. However, the calculate grade plane occurs at LBRB B2 level. This level will be used as the 1st floor level above grade plane while applying the requirements of Table 3804.1.1 for chemical analysis. LBRB B2 is also the lowest level of fire department access, where the fire department vehicle can be parked, and fire apparatus be staged (next to the loading dock). The intent of designating the stories above grade plane is to establish the number of stories occupants must traverse in order to egress the building and the number of stories emergency responders must consider and traverse in order to control a situation and assist occupants in egress. By designating the stories above grade plane from the lowest level of firefighter access, the intent is met. The levels below B2 are primarily to provide support for the building and includes mechanical and electrical equipment. These levels will not have any lab function and will have limited chemical use/storage. There are multiple levels with direct access and exit discharge to the exterior, occurring at the proposed second and third floors, all above the proposed level of grade plane for determining stories above grade plane. This limits the travel time for occupants to an exit discharge and allows firefighter access to the building. Additionally, the 11-story Type I-A building will follow the requirements of high-rise. This doesn’t include any Group I-2 or Group H occupancies, and will not have any lithium battery storage on the upper floors. As the 2019 OSSC allows such 11-story buildings to be constructed as Type I-B with 2-hour rated structure, the proposed building with 3-hour rated structure provides additional protection. Based on the calculated grade plane, location of the lowest level of fire department access, and levels of exit discharge, we proposed to modify the classification of the “first story above grade plane” to the third level of the building while calculating the percentage of MAQ per lab suite per 2019 OFC Table 3804.1.1. |
Appeal Decision
Classification of the 3rd level as the first story above grade plane for purpose of calculating the percentage of MAQ per lab suit: Hold for additional information.
Appellant may contact Nate Takara (503-823-4141) with questions.
Additional information is submitted as a no fee reconsideration, following the same submittal process and using the same appeals form as the original appeal. Indicate at the beginning of the appeal form that you are filing a reconsideration and include the original assigned Appeal ID number. The reconsideration will receive a new appeal number.
Include the original attachments and appeal language. Provide new text with only that information that is specific to the reconsideration in a separate paragraph(s) clearly identified as "Reconsideration Text" with any new attachments also referenced. No additional fee is required.