Appeal 26230

Appeal Summary

Status: Hold for Additional Information

Appeal ID: 26230

Submission Date: 10/11/21 11:05 AM

Hearing Date: 10/20/21

Case #: B-003

Appeal Type: Building

Project Type: commercial

Building/Business Name: The Weatherly Building

Appeal Involves: Alteration of an existing structure

Proposed use: Office

Project Address: 500-534 SE Morrison St

Appellant Name: Tom Jaleski

LUR or Permit Application #: Preliminary

Stories: 12 Occupancy: A, B, M, S-2 Construction Type: I-A

Fire Sprinklers: Yes - Throughout

Plans Examiner/Inspector: Jeff Rago

Plan Submitted Option: pdf   [File 1]

Payment Option: electronic

Appeal Information Sheet

Appeal item 1

Code Section

1019 OSSC,102.6 Existing structures.

Requires

102.6 Existing structures. The legal occupancy of any structure existing on the date of adoption of this code shall be permitted to continue without change, except as otherwise specifically provided in this code.

Code Modification or Alternate Requested

This appeal is intended to demonstrate that the Weatherly building is a legally permitted structure with continued legal occupancy based on compliance with a 1989 FM 41 Agreement and a 2005 FM 41 Agreement Extension.

Proposed Design

The Weatherly is a 12-story vintage high-rise completed in 1928 by architects Sutton & Whitney for Portland’s legendary ice cream wholesaler George Warren Weatherly. The Weatherly was the first high-rise building on the Eastside. Occupancy classifications include A, B, M and S-2. Fire sprinklers have been retroactively installed throughout in accordance with a 1989 FM 41 agreement.

The building is a legally existing structure that has benefited from an FM 41 Agreement between the owners and the City of Portland that is currently in place and still active. It was first established in 1989 and extended in 2005. The FM 41 agreement and FM 41 extension allowed the building to deviate from the prescriptive code provisions and still be considered compliant with the code requirements at the time alterations were being made to the building. The City is replacing these FM 41 Agreements with an appeal as the more appropriate and formal process for documenting alternates to the prescriptive code requirements.

This appeal will document the allowances granted by the existing FM 41 agreements and approved through this appeal to continue on a permanent basis for the life of the building. Per the original FM 41 agreement, "The City acknowledges that numerous renovations will probably occur over the years and that so long as building permits are obtained for such renovations, the existence of numerous such renovations will not alone create any noncompliance with this Agreement." Based on this mutual agreement, a new code provision will not be retroactively applied to the building.

The building is currently courting new tenants. Floors 8, 9, 10, and 12 have been stripped down to the concrete structure, and the owner intends to do the same with other floors as well.

The following consists of 1) improvements to the building already completed, 2) improvements still required to be completed, and 3) allowances granted by the FM 41 agreement. Completed improvements were verified on September 2, 2004 and recorded in the 2005 agreement.

  1. Improvements already completed are:

Sprinkler System Improvements.
• Complete automatic sprinkler system per NFPA 13 is installed.
• Sprinklers not required in interstitial space above suspended ceiling when combustibles are limited to low voltage communication cable.
• Unoccupied area above the twelfth floor is allowed to be used for storage and for elevator machine room, sprinklers are not required. Only non-combustible storage allowed in the machine room.
• Inspectors test and main drain assembly provided on each floor. Floor control valve provided with tamper switch and a water flow switch shall be provided to annunciate water flow by floor.
• Existing fire pump arrangement allowed to continue based on test demonstrating ability to deliver 250 gpm at 65 psi at the highest floor level. A test loop has been installed. Fire pump automatically starts upon sprinkler flow and continues to run until manually shut down.
• A double check valve assembly added to the supply side of the pump feeding the wet stand pipe riser that also supplies the sprinkler system.
• Existing fire department connection was modified to supplement both the basement sprinklers and the wet standpipe supplying the new sprinkler system.
Fire Alarm System Improvements.
• Fire alarm control panel capable of receiving two signals per floor.
• An annunciator that identifies alarm by floor located in the main building lobby as agreed to by Portland Fire & Rescue.
• Means of transmitting the alarm signal off premises to an approved central station receiving facility.
• A means of sounding the alarm on each floor activated by the sprinkler water flow.
Emergency Exit System Improvements.
• Emergency lighting activated upon loss of normal electrical power and sufficiently illuminating the exitway.
• Fire escape shall be maintained as an emergency exit and access provided by a break glass type panel.

  1. At a 2021 meeting, the City of Portland asked that the design team extend fire alarms into each tenant space. This process is currently underway, and fire alarms will be extended into each tenant space as part of each upcoming tenant improvement.
  2. In exchange for the Owner's agreement to install sprinklers, the City will except continued use of the following Building components/features:

• Non-rated corridor, door and ceiling construction with unprotected wall penetrations and with unlimited glazing of tempered or laminated relites. Replacement of doors may be by a comparable door to the existing and shall be smoke gasketed. No additional hardware (latches, locks, closures, etc.) will be required on existing doors. No additional doors will be required for exiting on any floor as presently configured;
• Dead end public corridors in excess of 20 feet shall be allowed to continue;
• Discontinuous corridors within tenant space, provided a continuous path of egress is maintained between exits on multi-tenant floors and around the perimeter of the core, on single-tenant floors;
• Use of the existing stairways and the lobby as an accepted means of exit;
• The basement shall be allowed to have only one exit provided the occupant load never exceeds 30 (the occupant load in the basement exceeds 30, and a second exit will be added);
• The basement under the annex area to the east shall not be required to have a second exit provided the area remains sprinklered and is used for storage only;
In addition, the city will not require any of the following:
• A fire alarm system, except for the sprinkler system tamper switches, annunciation, on-site water flow and central station reporting;
• Any smoke detector coverage;
• Public address and fire department communications systems;
• Any emergency power system. There is no emergency power available now to the fire pump, and none shall be required.
• Smoke detectors in the corridors;
• Magnetic door holders and closers on corridor doors;
• Elevator improvements of any kind, including without limitation elevator car recall capability or emergency telephones in the elevator cars, are not regulated by the City of Portland and are therefore outside the scope of this agreement.
• Changes in the heating, ventilating and air conditioning system;
• Window protection for the fire escape;
• Smoke control systems;
• Compartmentalization, areas of refuge or horizontal exiting;
• Pressurized elevator shafts and stair enclosures.

Reason for alternative

This appeal places the FM 41 Agreement and FM 41 Agreement Extension into appeal format to establish the approved legal occupancy of the Weatherly Building. These agreements remain in full force and are accepted as evidence of the continued legal occupancy of the building in support of this appeal. The text of the appeal follows exactly as it was agreed in the original agreement, except as modified in the 2005 extension, and modified for clarity as necessary.

We ask that you grant this appeal to ratify the FM 41 Agreement, the FM 41 Agreement Extension, and the approval of the building as a legally permitted structure.

Appeal Decision

Removal of FM 41 Agreement and FM 41 Agreement Extension with status of non-compliant conditions to be determined by building code appeal and to establish the approved legal occupancy of the Weatherly Building: Hold for additional information.
See note below regarding the process for submitting additional information.
Appellant may contact Jeff Rago (503-823-1079) with questions.

Additional information is submitted as a no fee reconsideration, following the same submittal process and using the same appeals form as the original appeal. Indicate at the beginning of the appeal form that you are filing a reconsideration and include the original assigned Appeal ID number. The reconsideration will receive a new appeal number.
Include the original attachments and appeal language. Provide new text with only that information that is specific to the reconsideration in a separate paragraph(s) clearly identified as "Reconsideration Text" with any new attachments also referenced. Once submitted, the appeal cannot be revised.
No additional fee is required.