Appeal 31949
Appeal Summary
Status: Decision Rendered
Appeal ID: 31949
Submission Date: 10/19/23 6:10 PM
Hearing Date: 11/1/23
Case #: B-004
Appeal Type: Building
Project Type: Residential
Building/Business Name: Catlin Keets
Appeal Involves: Erection of a new structure
Proposed use: Single Family Residence
Project Address: 9509 N Syracuse St.
Appellant Name: Bryan Montanio
LUR or Permit Application #: Permit 23-067153/158-RS
Stories: 1 Occupancy: R-2 Construction Type: V (w/ masonry walls)
Fire Sprinklers: No
Plans Examiner/Inspector:
Plan Submitted Option: pdf [File 1] [File 2] [File 3]
Payment Option: electronic
Appeal Information Sheet
Appeal item 1
| Code Section | R302.2.1 |
|---|---|
| Requires | From code cited in Life Saftey Checksheet: "Please note that in order to qualify for MHLD the current demising wall design does not meet the code. The property line cannot pass through a wall, therefore there must be an air gap between the units for MHLD. The proposed common 2-hr wall meets the requirements for townhouses with no real property lines separating the townhouses. If this project is submitted for a future Middle Housing Land Division (MHLD) for the creation of real property lines between the townhouses, the common 2-hr wall will not meet the separation requirements of R302.2.1, item 3 for real property lines." R302.2.1(3) provides a common option for a 2-hour fire-rated wall and lists an exception for townhouses that are separated by a real property line. R30202.1(4) provides an option for other tested assemblies that provide an equivalent fire-protection rating and lists an exception that privacy walls may be constructed of heavy timber. |
| Code Modification or Alternate Requested | We are proposing a common 4-hour fire-rated wall with additional health and comfort benefits as part of a healthy home case study project. |
| Proposed Design | Our project intends to demonstrate and showcase healthy and high-performance construction and assemblies in a small, well-crafted space. A key assembly is our exterior walls, which use a masonry product called Faswall which is produced in Philomath OR. Faswall has improved fire and acoustical rating over light frame construction, is healthier, and longer lasting. I have included testing and technical data provided by the manufacturer in attachments to this submittal. The Faswall product also serves as a great substrate for plaster, and this assembly will also benefit from a beautiful plaster interior finish which also serves as our primary air barrier. |
| Reason for alternative | We feel that requiring light frame construction in this project will lower the overall quality of the wall assembly and that is not the intent of the code. This alternative will exceed the fire safety requirements as outlined in R302.2.1. In addition, it will make the space more healthy and comfortable and provide a precedent for more projects using this healthy, sustainable, and durable material. Benefits of Faswall include:
|
Appeal Decision
Use of common 4-hour fire-rated party wall: Granted provided the wall meets sound transmission requirements of ORSC Appendix K.
Appellant may contact John Butler (503 865-6427) or e-mail at John.Butler@portlandoregon.gov with questions.
Use of common 4-hour fire-rated party wall: Granted provided the wall meets sound transmission requirements of ORSC Appendix K.
Appellant may contact John Butler (503 865-6427) or e-mail at John.Butler@portlandoregon.gov with questions.