Appeal 33456

Appeal Summary

Status: Decision Rendered

Appeal ID: 33456

Submission Date: 9/4/24 3:15 PM

Hearing Date: 9/11/24

Case #: P-002

Appeal Type: Plumbing

Project Type: commercial

Building/Business Name: JULIA WEST

Appeal Involves: Erection of a new structure

Proposed use: Apartment Building

Project Address: 522 SW 13th Ave

Appellant Name: Willy Chandler

LUR or Permit Application #: Permit 23-052714-CO

Stories: 12 Occupancy: R-2 Construction Type: Type IV-B

Fire Sprinklers: Yes - Throughout

Plans Examiner/Inspector: Maureen McCafferty

Plan Submitted Option: pdf   [File 1]   [File 2]   [File 3]

Payment Option: electronic

Appeal Information Sheet

Appeal item 1

Code Section

Section C 601 of the 2021 Oregon Plumbing Specialty Code

Requires

Emergency/Overflow floor drain fixture drains into intermediary drainage stack with individual vent. See attached Exhibit 1 with ‘Standard Approach’ configuration for more detail.

Code Modification or Alternate Requested

Emergency/Overflow floor drain fixture drains directly into primary drainage stack. See attached Exhibit 1 with ‘Proposed Approach’ configuration for more detail.

Proposed Design

The owner has requested an overflow floor drain added at residential dwelling unit kitchens to capture overflow from the kitchen sink and/or dishwasher. Because the emergency floor drain does not add to the drainage stack load, there is not a concern about overloading the capacity of the stack. The function of the individual vent provided in the standard approach (See exhibit, Left Figure) is to protect the fixture against siphonage (self-siphonage and to some extent, induced siphonage). The stack allows for airflow to balance pressure differentials within the system to ensure no more than 1 inch water seal is depleted even under a maximum loading event.
The viability of this approach and performance can be verified by reviewing the performance of the single stack drainage configuration, which allows fixtures to connect into the stack directly. The proposed configuration, however, is not a single stack drainage configuration, given that the proposed configuration has the sink individually vented as well as the drainage stack. Given the research undertaken on the airflow performance and assurance of trap seal protection during a peak drainage flow event, there are no concerns regarding the performance of the proposed approach.
Attached is a study from Heriot Watt University commissioned by ASPE Portland (Exhibit 2) as well as a paper authored by the proponent reviewing the details of design requirements for the single stack drainage configuration in 12 different regions (Exhibit 3).

Reason for alternative

Responding to owner requests regarding water damage from residents leaving sinks running and clogging the overflows, there has been an increasing number of requests to provide floor drains in bathrooms and/or kitchens. The cost of providing an additional drainage stack is often seen by the developer as not financially viable in many cases.
Additionally, requirements for firestopping at floor penetrations and concealed piping materials in Type IV-B construction add cost and installation complexity to reduce fire risk.
This solution makes the additional floor drain viable, while reducing costs, fire risk, and the potential for water damage, all while relying on proven drainage theory and international design guidance.

Appeal Decision

Allow the use of Appendix C 601 to use a single stack design for emergency floor drains at kitchens: Granted provided all floor drains are primed and an engineer stamp is provided at plan review.

"The Administrative Appeal Board finds that the information submitted by the appellant demonstrates that the approved modifications or alternate methods are consistent with the intent of the code; do not lessen health, safety, accessibility, life, fire safety or structural requirements; and that special conditions unique to this project make strict application of those code sections impractical.

Pursuant to City Code Chapter 24.10, you may appeal this decision to the Building Code Board of Appeal within 90 calendar days of the date this decision is published. For information on the appeals process, go to www.portlandoregon.gov/bds/appealsinfo, call (503) 823-6251 or come to the Development Services Center."