Appeal 33528
Appeal Summary
Status: Decision Rendered
Appeal ID: 33528
Submission Date: 10/9/24 7:48 PM
Hearing Date: 10/16/24
Case #: B-010
Appeal Type: Building
Project Type: commercial
Building/Business Name: Lovejoy Building
Appeal Involves: occ Change from M to A and B
Proposed use: Commercial
Project Address: 1624 NW Lovejoy Street
Appellant Name: Michelle Schulz
LUR or Permit Application #: Preliminary
Stories: 2 Occupancy: B, M, S, & A Construction Type: IIIB
Fire Sprinklers: Yes - Throughout
Plans Examiner/Inspector: None currently
Plan Submitted Option: pdf [File 1] [File 2] [File 3]
Payment Option: electronic
Appeal Information Sheet
Appeal item 1
| Code Section | Portland Title 24 section 24.85.040 |
|---|---|
| Requires | 24.85.040 Change of Occupancy or Use: A. Occupancy Change to a Higher Relative Hazard Classification. An occupancy change to a higher relative hazard classification will require seismic improvements based upon the factors of changes in the net floor area and the occupant load increases as indicated in Table 24.85-B below. All improvements to either the OSSC or ASCE 41 improvement standard shall be made such that the entire building conforms to the appropriate standard indicated in Table 24.85-B. |
| Code Modification or Alternate Requested | This appeal requests that this building be approved to change occupancy of a portion of the ground floor from its current B occupancy, and baseline M occupancy, to an B and A occupancy without triggering a seismic upgrade. |
| Proposed Design | The Lovejoy Building is an existing 2-story type IIIB low rise office building in Portland, OR. This is an existing permitted building constructed in 1910. The office building is protected with an automatic fire sprinkler system throughout. The occupancy of the building based on the 2004 Baseline documents were Mercantile (Group M), Storage/Loading (Group S), and Office accessory (Group B) on the first floor and Office (Group B) on the second floor. This appeal proposes to modify a portion of the ground floor Mercantile (Group M) to a future Assembly and Office area including;
o Changing from an occupant load of 1:30 to an occupant load of 1:15. Adding 43 occupants.
o Changing from an occupant load of 1:30 to an occupant load of 1:100. Subtracting 39 occupants.
The proposed A and B occupancy changes will not increase the occupancy threshold by more than the 149 occupants with respect to the legal building occupancy as of October 1, 2004, before the seismic upgrade requirements mandated by section 24.85.040 are applicable. |
| Reason for alternative | The building owner is proposing these future modifications to the interior layout to accommodate a prospective long-term tenant and potential buyer of the building. The agreement is based on these revisions to the occupancy and occupant load not triggering additional seismic upgrade. The attached drawings with occupancy calculations (based on the 2004 baseline) demonstrates that a seismic upgrade is not required in order to permit these modifications, due to the limited change in occupants. Including;
Based on Title 24 section 24.85.040 allowances, multiple occupancy changes to a single building may be made under this section without triggering a seismic upgrade provided the cumulative changes do not exceed 1/3 of the building net floor area or add more than 149 occupants with respect to the legal building occupancy as of October 1, 2004. The added 4 occupants associated with this proposed change of occupancy is the only building area occupancy changes on record for this building since the 2004 baseline occupancy was established, thus staying under the 149-occupant increase. We understand that the Portland seismic code requirements were implemented to protect the life and safety of the building occupants when buildings are being significantly changed. This change in occupancy is a minor modification to the occupant load that doesn’t result in a more hazardous condition for a large occupant count. We hope you agree and support this appeal/occupant load clarification to not trigger a seismic upgrade. |
Appeal Decision
"Establish that no seismic upgrades are required for future use based on comparison of 2004 Baseline occupancy and proposed occupancies and occupant loads: Denied. Proposal does not demonstrate equivalent life safety.
Appellant may contact Kathy Aulwes (503-823-8141 or katherine.aulwes@portlandoregon.gov) with questions."
"Pursuant to City Code Chapter 24.10, you may appeal this decision to the Building Code Board of Appeal within 90 calendar days of the date this decision is published. For information on the appeals process, how to file a reconsideration, and appealing to the Building Code Board of Appeal, go to https://www.portland.gov/ppd/file-appeal/appeal-process or email PPDAppeals@portlandoregon.gov.
"