Appeal 33544
Appeal Summary
Status: Decision Rendered on RECONSIDERATION OF 33489
Appeal ID: 33544
Submission Date: 10/24/24 12:59 AM
Hearing Date: 10/30/24
Case #: P-002
Appeal Type: Plumbing
Project Type: residential
Building/Business Name:
Appeal Involves: Erection of a new structure,Reconsideration of appeal,other: Sewer easement between 5'-10'
Proposed use: Single family residential
Project Address: 8416 SE CLAY ST
Appellant Name: Vitaly Sukhanov
LUR or Permit Application #: Permit 24-009050/55/57/64-RS
Stories: 2 Occupancy: Standard Residential Construction Type: Standard wood construction
Fire Sprinklers: No
Plans Examiner/Inspector: Clare Fuchs
Plan Submitted Option: pdf [File 1]
Payment Option: electronic
Appeal Information Sheet
Appeal item 1
| Code Section | BCG 03-11 |
|---|---|
| Requires | The requirements are for easements to be a width of 10'. However, the proposed easements in some areas of the site plan show to be 5' in width. Reconsideration text: "Depth of the footings and depth of the sewer pipes with the distances are all located on the site plan at 3 different locations. We understand that depending on the depth and proximity of pipe to the footing, the area may need a special inspection for soil compaction." |
| Code Modification or Alternate Requested | The intent is to get approved to have an easement of less than 10' on this site for the new proposed utilities. |
| Proposed Design | Reconsideration text: "Although we are using open trench excavation for installation, maintenance for the sewer pipes will not use open trench excavation. |
| Reason for alternative | This will allow us to provide better housing units and designed for affordable housing. |
Appeal Decision
Granted provided: Inspector to verify depths during inspections. Compaction and special inspection may be required if depths impact the footing/foundation.
"The Administrative Appeal Board finds with the conditions noted, that the information submitted by the appellant demonstrates that the approved modifications or alternate methods are consistent with the intent of the code; do not lessen health, safety, accessibility, life, fire safety or structural requirements; and that special conditions unique to this project make strict application of those code sections impractical.
Pursuant to City Code Chapter 24.10, you may appeal this decision to the Building Code Board of Appeal within 90 calendar days of the date this decision is published. For information on the appeals process, how to file a reconsideration, and appealing to the Building Code Board of Appeal, go to https://www.portland.gov/ppd/file-appeal/appeal-process or email PPDAppeals@portlandoregon.gov.
"