Appeal 33578
Appeal Summary
Status: Decision on Reconsideration OF 33558
Appeal ID: 33578
Submission Date: 11/13/24 2:08 PM
Hearing Date: 11/20/24
Case #: R-01
Appeal Type: Building
Project Type: Residential
Building/Business Name: a/A Architecture
Appeal Involves: Reconsideration of appeal
Proposed use: Residential
Project Address: 2933 NE 44th Ave
Appellant Name: Christopher Lyman
LUR or Permit Application #: Preliminary
Stories: 2 Occupancy: R-3 Construction Type: V-B
Fire Sprinklers: No
Plans Examiner/Inspector:
Plan Submitted Option: pdf [File 1]
Payment Option: electronic
Appeal Information Sheet
Appeal item 1
| Code Section | R311.7.1 |
|---|---|
| Requires | Stairways shall not be less than 36" in clear width at all points above the permitted handrail height and below the required head room height. The clear width of stairways at and below the handrail height, including treads and railings, shall not be less than 31-1/2 inches where a handrail is installed on one side [...]. |
| Code Modification or Alternate Requested | We are requesting an exemption to the code requirement for overall clear width and width at handrail height. |
| Proposed Design | Residence includes a pre-existing non-conforming basement stair leading to non-habitable space including a laundry room, storage, and workshop. Existing stair is 2'-4 3/4" at the narrowest point. The stair rise is an inconsistent height (between 6-1/2" and 8-1/2") and stair tread is 8-3/4" deep nosing to nosing. There is no handrail. The minimum head room is 6'-1/2". Our proposal to improve the safety of the stair is to increase the overall length of the stairwell, thereby allowing for the stair to be rebuilt to meet current code with regards to riser height, tread length, and head height. We also intend to add a handrail to allow the homeowner to better access the laundry room. |
| Reason for alternative | The width of the existing stair at the top of the run is dictated by a primary bearing wall and a code minimum width hallway which does not allow for a redesign that meets the building code. Moving either the bearing wall or the hallway would be cost prohibitive and require a major renovation that is outside the clients means. We are looking for an exemption to be able to improve the overall safety and usability of the stair for the homeowner. Reconsideration Text:
|
Appeal Decision
Reduced stairway width of 28 3/4": Granted as proposed.
The Administrative Appeal Board finds that the information submitted by the appellant demonstrates that the approved modifications or alternate methods are consistent with the intent of the code; do not lessen health, safety, accessibility, life, fire safety or structural requirements; and that special conditions unique to this project make strict application of those code sections impractical.