Appeal 33581

Appeal Summary

Status: Decision Rendered- RECONSIDERATION OF 33557

Appeal ID: 33581

Submission Date: 11/18/24 11:56 AM

Hearing Date: 11/20/24

Case #: B-003

Appeal Type: Building

Project Type: commercial

Building/Business Name: 1318 NW 20th Tower

Appeal Involves: Erection of a new structure

Proposed use: Affordable Multifamily Housing

Project Address: 1318 NW 20th

Appellant Name: Daniel DiCicco

LUR or Permit Application #: Other Appeal #33557

Stories: 11 Occupancy: R-2 Construction Type: Concrete

Fire Sprinklers: Yes -

Plans Examiner/Inspector: John Cooley

Plan Submitted Option: pdf   [File 1]   [File 2]

Payment Option: electronic

Appeal Information Sheet

Appeal item 1

Code Section

OSSC 403.5.1

Requires

This is a re-appeal:

OSSC 403.5.1 specifies that in high-rise buildings, interior exit stairways must be located remotely from each other to ensure redundancy. This code section expressly identifies that scissor stairs shall be counted only as one interior exit stairway.

Code Modification or Alternate Requested

This code re-appeal seeks authorization to use a single scissor stair configuration to satisfy the exit requirements of IBC 1006.3 and OSSC 403.5.1 in a high-rise building, providing two egress paths within a limited footprint while ensuring compliance with safety and functional standards.

Proposed Design

We are developing an affordable housing project in Portland that maximizes density by leveraging the city’s new Floor Area Ratio (FAR) allowances, designed to encourage high-density, affordable construction. Our building, with a footprint of approximately 50x80 feet, achieves this increased density with a carefully designed scissor stair—the only viable solution to provide both required egress paths within the compact space.

Reason for alternative

We are providing equivalent fire, life, and safety protections in this scissor stair configuration by massively increasing the fire rating of every component of the stair shaft.

First, as shown in the updated plans, the stair shaft enclosure will have a minimum 4-hour rating arising from a 10" concrete wall. Thus, if there is a fire in the portion of the building outside of the stair shaft, the stair shaft will have a 100% increased fire rating and remain safer for longer. The exit doors will also be 3-hour rated.

Within the stair shaft itself, the two interlocking stairs will be separated by a 3-hour rated 6" concrete wall, while each of the landings will also be a 3-hour concrete landing. The stairs themselves will be pre-cast 3-hour-rated concrete. Will maintain this rating by filling all gaps with fire caulking.

And finally, we propose the addition of new sprinkler heads on each landing.

In sum, these two interlocking stairways will be completely separated from one another by three-hour materials. Additional sprinkler heads will operate to further extend fire protections in the unlikely event a fire begins in one of the stairwells. And finally, the entire stair shaft will be enclosed in a 4-hour wall, greatly reducing the likelihood that a fire from outside the stair shaft would breach the shaft.

Appeal Decision

Allow the use of a scissor stair configuration within a high-rise building: Denied. The proposal does not provide equivalent fire and life safety. The appellant may contact John Cooley (503-865-6533) with questions.

"Pursuant to City Code Chapter 24.10, you may appeal this decision to the Building Code Board of Appeal within 90 calendar days of the date this decision is published. For information on the appeals process, how to file a reconsideration, and appealing to the Building Code Board of Appeal, go to https://www.portland.gov/ppd/file-appeal/appeal-process or email PPDAppeals@portlandoregon.gov.
"