Appeal 33668
Appeal Summary
Status: DECISION RENDERED RECONSIDERATION OF 33605
Appeal ID: 33668
Submission Date: 1/22/25 2:49 PM
Hearing Date: 1/29/25
Case #: B-002
Appeal Type: Building
Project Type: commercial
Building/Business Name: Pepsi B
Appeal Involves: Reconsideration of appeal
Proposed use: Multi-family
Project Address: 830 NE 25th Ave
Appellant Name: Tom Jaleski
LUR or Permit Application #: Permit 24-039925-CO
Stories: 8 Occupancy: R-2 S-2 Construction Type: 1A/IIIA
Fire Sprinklers: Yes - throughout
Plans Examiner/Inspector: Brian McCall
Plan Submitted Option: pdf [File 1]
Payment Option: electronic
Appeal Information Sheet
Appeal item 1
| Code Section | OSSC 403 |
|---|---|
| Requires | 403.1 Applicability. High-rise buildings shall comply with Sections 403.2 through 403.6. |
| Code Modification or Alternate Requested | Request for relief from some OSSC 403 high rise building provisions as noted in the proposed design. |
| Proposed Design | The Pepsi B will be an 8-story apartment building with 5 stories of Type IIIA construction over 3 stories of Type IA construction. The two construction types are separated by a 3-hour horizontal fire rated assembly and protected throughout with an NFPA 13 automatic sprinkler system. While the top occupied story of the building will be located less than 75 feet above the lowest level of fire department access, the building will have an occupied roof deck, which will be located 8 feet above this height. The occupied roof area will be for the private use of owners, residents and guests only, with no access to the general public. The proposed design will mitigate the increased risk to occupants on this roof deck by including some high-rise building provisions that add value plus other fire and life safety provisions that provide direct relief to those on the terrace in an emergency. The intent is to be provide equivalent safety to the roof terrace occupants without burdening the project with cost that does not provide value to these small number of occupants or the rest of the building occupants. The key elements proposed are those that provide protected access to the emergency personnel and safe egress to the roof level occupants. This responds directly to the additional distance each group has to travel in an emergency. Additional measures increase the overall safety level for this building, even though it may not be directly related to the occupants on the roof. This will reduce the probability of a serious fire event at the roof level and make this design even more robust. A comparison against all of the high-rise provisions is included in the “reason for the alternative” section so that the appeal board can compare this proposal against a standard high-rise building. We are requesting relief from the following high-rise requirements: • SFRM bond strength of 430 psf. The proposal will meet the following high-rise requirements: The proposal will provide these additional measures to provide safer access and egress from the terrace: RECONSIDERATION TEXT: |
| Reason for alternative | With a height approximately 83 feet above the lowest level of fire department access, the occupied roof exceeds the high-rise threshold of 75 feet. The proposed design includes a base of Type I-A construction with 3-hour separation from the upper structure. The code does not provide a nuanced code path to the OSSC 403 high-rise requirements, so this appeal is for a customized approach based on compliance with many of the requirements, exceeding some, and requesting relief from others: • 403.1 Applicability – High-rise buildings shall comply with Sections 403.2 through 403.6. • 403.2 Construction – No reduction in fire resistance rating requested. Building exceeds. • 403.2.2 Seismic Considerations – All buildings fall under Category-II; no special requirements apply. Building complies. • 403.2.3 Structural Integrity of Interior Exit Stairways and Elevator Hoistway Enclosures – Not applicable. Building complies. • 403.2.4 Sprayed Fire-Resistant Materials (SFRM) – The bond strength of the SFRM installed throughout the building shall be in accordance with Table 403.2.4. Relief is requested from SFRM bond strength requirement of Table 403.2.4. • 403.3 Automatic Sprinkler System – Building will be fully sprinklered per Section 903.3.1.1. Building complies. • 403.3.3 Secondary Water Supply – A standpipe is provided at each of the stairs, and adequate water is available. Relief is requested from Section 403.3.3 for secondary water supply. • 403.3.4 Fire Pump Room – A fire pump is not required but is provided in a fire pump room separated from the rest of the building by a 2-hour fire barrier. Building exceeds. • 403.4.1 Smoke Detection – Provided throughout the building. Building complies. • 403.4.2 Fire Alarm System – Provided throughout the building. Building complies. • 403.4.3 Standpipe System – Provided throughout in all enclosed exit stairs of the building. Building complies. • 403.4.4 Emergency Voice/Alarm Communication System – Audio-visual fire alarm notification will be provided. Relief is requested from Emergency Voice/Alarm Communication System. • 403.4.5 Emergency Responder Radio Coverage – A Public Safety Distributed Antenna System (DAS) will provide enhanced two-way radio service, ensuring that first responders can maintain wireless communications within the building. Relief is requested from Emergency Responder Radio Coverage. • 403.4.6 Fire Command – The building will be provided with a Fire Operations Room, located near the west entrance, to allow the incident command officer to effectively manage resources. Relief is requested from Fire Command Center complying with Section 911. • 403.4.7 Smoke Removal – Relief is requested from smoke removal. • 403.4.8 Standby and Emergency Power – Emergency generator and tank is provided inside the building. The generator room is separated from the rest of the building by 2-hour fire barrier. Building exceeds. • 403.5.1 Remoteness of Interior Exit Stairways – Two exit stairs are located more than 30 feet apart. Additional exit stair is not required and not provided. Building complies. • 403.5.3 Stairway Door Operation – Stairway door unlocking to be provided at the enclosed stair extending to the occupied roof. Relief is requested from stairway door unlocking requirement for the second egress stair. • 403.5.3.1 Stairway Communication System – Stairway communication system is provided at the enclosed stair extending to the occupied roof. Relief is requested from stairway communication system for the second egress stair. • 403.5.4 Smokeproof Enclosures – Stair pressurization is provided at the enclosed stair extending to the occupied roof. The elevators are protected with a smokeproof lobby and smoke curtains on the hoistway enclosure. Relief is requested from smokeproof enclosures and shaft pressurization for the second exit stair. • 403.5.5 Luminous Egress Path Markings – Luminous egress markings are provided at the pressurized stair to the roof. Relief is requested from luminous egress markings for the second egress stair. • 403.5.6 Emergency Escape and Rescue – Emergency Escape & Rescue openings will be provided. Relief is requested from Emergency Escape and Rescue • 403.6 Elevators – Elevator hoistway door opening shall be protected per section 3006.3. Two-way communication is provided at elevators per section 3008.6.6. Building complies. • 403.6.1 Fire Service Access Elevator – Fire service access elevator is not required and not provided. Building complies. Equivalent and additional protection is provided by enhanced fire-resistive construction due to podium building and not taking advantage of available fire-resistive reductions. We are providing 2-hour protected stairs with a 3-hour base, standpipes provided in all stairs, fire pump provided and located in a room separated by a 2-hour fire barrier, smoke detection and fire alarm throughout the building, emergency responder radio coverage, emergency generator separated by 2-hour fire barrier, emergency escape and rescue openings, and smoke protection at elevator door openings. Additionally we are providing an enhanced means of egress corridor connecting the two exit stairs at the 8th floor as described in the proposed design section and including a 5 feet wide exit access stair from the roof level to the amenity room as shown on the attached plans. These additional mitigations, combined with the robust building construction as designed, provide protection and reduce the overall risk similar to a mid-rise building. Therefore, we urge you to approve this appeal. RECONSIDERATION TEXT: The proposed design is to not provide, based on discussions, the bond strength of SFRM, secondary water supply, and smoke removal. The proposed design will provide alternative protection measures to the following, the fire pump room will be accessible in the parking garage will be in compliance with Building Official Determination 21-02, manual wet standpipes providing pressure for all sprinkler operations, emergency voice alarm devices provided in public corridors and public spaces, fire command closet provided at the entrance lobby in lieu of a Fire Command Center, and emergency escape and rescue openings will only be provided on the second floor. The proposed design provides equivalent protection based on all interior floors are less than 75’ above lowest level of firefighter access and request approval of this appeal. |
Appeal Decision
"Omission of specific high-rise requirements for building with roof deck more than 75 feet above the lowest level of fire department access: Granted as proposed to omit the following Requirements:
1. SFRM bond strength of 430psf
2. Secondary water supply
3. Automatic wet standpipe
4. Fire command center minimum size, all components are still required.
5. Smoke removal per 403.4.7
"
"The Administrative Appeal Board finds that the information submitted by the appellant demonstrates that the approved modifications or alternate methods are consistent with the intent of the code; do not lessen the health, safety, accessibility, life, fire safety or structural requirements; and that special conditions unique to this project make strict application of those code sections impractical.