Appeal 33692
Appeal Summary
Status: DECISION RENDERED
Appeal ID: 33692
Submission Date: 2/12/25 3:13 PM
Hearing Date: 2/19/25
Case #: B-006
Appeal Type: Building
Project Type: commercial
Building/Business Name: Grassa Downtown
Appeal Involves: Alteration of an existing structure
Proposed use: A-2 Assembly- Restaurant
Project Address: 1205 SW Washington
Appellant Name: JOHN WEIL
LUR or Permit Application #: Permit
Stories: 24 Occupancy: R-2, B, M, A-2, S-2 Construction Type: 1-A
Fire Sprinklers: Yes - throughout
Plans Examiner/Inspector: Renay Radtke Butts
Plan Submitted Option: pdf [File 1]
Payment Option: electronic
Appeal Information Sheet
Appeal item 1
| Code Section | 1007.1.1, 1007.1.1.1 |
|---|---|
| Requires | 1007.1.1, exception 2
1007.1.1.1
|
| Code Modification or Alternate Requested | Allow existing exterior storefront doors from tenant space (one with a 4 riser stair) to satisfy requirement of 2 means of egress. The doors themselves meet the 1/3rd distance required, except for a 4 riser stair up to one of the doors which, measured to the closest riser, reduces the separation distance to less than 1/3rd the overall measurement. |
| Proposed Design | The 2 existing exterior doors are separated by more than 1/3rd the overall diagonal measurement of the area served, however one of the doors has 4 risers that, per 1007.1.1.1, exception 2, when measured to the closest riser, is less than 1/3rd the diagonal. This appeal is proposing to allow the condition described above to meet the requirement for 2 exits from the space, based on the availability of 2 additional nonconforming exits. Alternate exit B is through a non-separated adjacent space (Bar / Beer O’Clock) which is under the same lease and ownership. While this space operates on separate hours from the Dining Room and Kitchen, there are no barriers preventing circulation between spaces (no doors). This will allow occupants to exit from the main Dining Room in an emergency situation. An additional exit sign would be added. |
| Reason for alternative | This alternate is proposed in order to create two non separated spaces within the overall tenant space. This is desired to allow removal of some existing walls that, while previously added to the space, and permitted as to look like the addition of a vestibule, were never built as a fully enclosed vestibule, and with the now proposed removal of these walls to again create a single Dining Room, a vestibule is not desired.. With the acceptance of this appeal, the Dining Room and Kitchen use will be less than 3,000 sf and meet the vestibule requirement exception of the Energy Code (ASHRAE 90.1 section 5.4.3.3). An alternate approach to this situation would be to appeal the vestibule requirement and have the Bar Area, Dining Room and Kitchen as all one space with 4 conforming exits, plus the kitchen exit |
Appeal Decision
Exclude mid-level exit access stair from distance calculation: Granted provided exit signage at Exit B is installed and maintained.
"The Administrative Appeal Board finds that the information submitted by the appellant demonstrates that the approved modifications or alternate methods are consistent with the intent of the code; do not lessen the health, safety, accessibility, life, fire safety or structural requirements; and that special conditions unique to this project make strict application of those code sections impractical.