Appeal 33747
Appeal Summary
Status: DECISION RENDERED
Appeal ID: 33747
Submission Date: 4/2/25 1:49 PM
Hearing Date: 4/9/25
Case #: B-003
Appeal Type: Building
Project Type: commercial
Building/Business Name: PORTLAND POLICE BUREAU: TRAINING DIVISION
Appeal Involves: Alteration of an existing structure
Proposed use: B, S1, S2, A3, H3
Project Address: 14912 NE AIRPORT WAY, PORTLAND OR, 97230
Appellant Name: SHERRY ALIBERTI
LUR or Permit Application #: Permit 25-021723-FA
Stories: 7 Occupancy: B, S1, S2, A3, H3 Construction Type: IIIB
Fire Sprinklers: Yes -
Plans Examiner/Inspector: Lisa Buellesbach
Plan Submitted Option: pdf [File 1] [File 2]
Payment Option: electronic
Appeal Information Sheet
Appeal item 1
| Code Section | Section 13.4 of ASCE 7-16 |
|---|---|
| Requires | NONSTRUCTURAL COMPONENT ANCHORAGE |
| Code Modification or Alternate Requested | Work proposed for Airport Way Police Training Facility is primarily for replacing the roof assembly on the existing building - but the City of Portland (owner) also wanted to improve maintenance staff safety on the roof with the addition of OSHA compliant railings - both mechanically fastened where cost effective and ballasted railings at very limited locations. |
| Proposed Design | The existing concrete tilt-up walls were designed with a mix of low to medium height parapet walls at the flat roof. In the proposed roof replacement work some parapet walls need to be raised in height to capture the new (thicker) roof assembly that includes additional layers of insulation. At these locations (as noted on the plan) the built-up parapet wall is proposed to be 15” min to capture the new roof assembly and coping. The ballasted railings are proposed to provide OSHA-required fall protection at 42” high at these low parapet wall locations only. Mechanically-attached OSHA railings are proposed where existing parapet walls are 20” tall. Equivalent protection is provided by the ballasted railing system that is tested to meet the requirements for personal safety per OSSC 1607.9.1 per attached report. The counterweighted railing system is to be publicly bid with the complete scope therefore the product test results are provided for reference and will be procured with this manufacturer or an approved equal. |
| Reason for alternative | The existing concrete tilt-up exterior walls would require complicated structural upgrades in order to provide 42” tall parapet walls or to mechanically-attach OSHA railings in all locations. We have limited the ballasted railings to only the areas that would require more complicated modifications to the existing building. |
Appeal Decision
Allow a ballasted guard rail system in lieu of a physically attached system: Granted as proposed.
The Administrative Appeal Board finds that the information submitted by the appellant demonstrates that the approved modifications or alternate methods are consistent with the intent of the code; do not lessen the health, safety, accessibility, life, fire safety or structural requirements; and that special conditions unique to this project make strict application of those code sections impractical.