Appeal 34768
Appeal Summary
Status: Decision Rendered RECONSIDERATION OF 33663
Appeal ID: 34768
Submission Date: 4/18/25 10:42 AM
Hearing Date: 4/30/25
Case #: B-001
Appeal Type: Building
Project Type: commercial
Building/Business Name: Strong Property Housing
Appeal Involves: Erection of a new structure,Reconsideration of appeal
Proposed use: Multi-Family Housing
Project Address: 4985 N Williams Ave.
Appellant Name: Bryan Bahr
LUR or Permit Application #: Permit 24-011154-CO
Stories: 4 Occupancy: R-2 Construction Type: 5-A
Fire Sprinklers: Yes - Fully Sprinklered
Plans Examiner/Inspector: Robert Keal
Plan Submitted Option: pdf [File 1]
Payment Option: electronic
Appeal Information Sheet
Appeal item 1
| Code Section | 2022 OSSC 703.3 and 704.3 |
|---|---|
| Requires | 703.3 Alternative Methods for Determining Fire Resistance. The application of any of the alternative methods listed in this section shall be based on the fire exposure and acceptance criteria specified in ASTM E 119 or UL 263. 704.4 Protection of primary structural frame other than columns. Members of the primary structural frame other than columns that are required to have protection to achieve a fire-resistance rating and support more than two floors or one floor and roof, or support a load-bearing wall or a no-load-bearing wall more than two stories high, shall be provided individual encasement protection by protecting them on all sides for the full length, including connections to other structural members, with materials having the required fire-resistance rating. |
| Code Modification or Alternate Requested | To provide 1 or 2-hour fire rated protection for steel plates that compose the steel column cap / bucket assembly. |
| Proposed Design | The proposed design consists of 1/4” steel plates that compose a column cap that supports Glu-lam beams and are connected to a 1 or 2-hour fire rated HSS column. The steel plates are to be protected by intumescent paint with the thickness required by the manufacturer to provide 1 or 2-hour fire rated protection. See (Exhibit 1) attached plan with steel column cap locations and details for reference. The proposed design is equivalent to the UL-listed assembly BXUV.N657 to achieve a 1 or 2-hour fire-rated protection (Exhibit 2). See also Project Submittal (Exhibit 3) which describes the fire resistance capacity of Intumescent Coating intended for use. RECONSIDERATION TEXT: |
| Reason for alternative | As a primary structural member, the steel column cap assemblies are required to have a 1 or 2-Hour fire rating per Table 601 of the OSSC. The steel plates are protected by intumescent paint to provide 1 or 2-hour fire-resistance, equivalent to the protection provided by the tested UL assembly Y657. The proposed design for the steel plates with intumescent paint protection exceed/achieves the required 1 or 2-hour fire-resistance (as required by the referenced detail). RECONSIDERATION TEXT: |
Appeal Decision
Alternate 1- and 2-hour fire protection of steel members with intumescent coating per engineered analysis: Granted provided the fireproofing submittal with proposed coating thicknesses for the steel buckets, plates, and column caps is reviewed and approved by a fire protection engineer from Zari Consulting Group. A letter to this effect with the fire protection engineer's stamp will be required prior to approval of the fireproofing deferred submittal.
The Administrative Appeal Board finds that the information submitted by the appellant demonstrates that the approved modifications or alternate methods are consistent with the intent of the code; do not lessen the health, safety, accessibility, life, fire safety or structural requirements; and that special conditions unique to this project make strict application of those code sections impractical.