Appeal 34781
Appeal Summary
Status: Decision Rendered
Appeal ID: 34781
Submission Date: 4/28/25 8:37 AM
Hearing Date: 5/7/25
Case #: B-002
Appeal Type: Building
Project Type: commercial
Building/Business Name: Watermark II
Appeal Involves:
Proposed use: Office Space
Project Address: 4386 S Macadam Ave
Appellant Name: Matt Bryant
LUR or Permit Application #: Preliminary
Stories: 4 Occupancy: B Construction Type: II
Fire Sprinklers: Yes - Throughout
Plans Examiner/Inspector: Geoffrey Pena
Plan Submitted Option: pdf [File 1] [File 2] [File 3] [File 4]
Payment Option: mail
Appeal Information Sheet
Appeal item 1
| Code Section | 2022 OSSC 1006 |
|---|---|
| Requires | 1006 Number of Exists and Exit Access doorways |
| Code Modification or Alternate Requested | Removal of original appeal in full. Conditions for appeal no longer apply as the space has been revised since the original installation. Removal of non-required smoke detection throughout. Required detection to remain for recall and code minimum detection. |
| Proposed Design | The existing appeal was based on the 1st floor being two separate tenants (north & South) see attached drawing on original appeal. |
| Reason for alternative | The condition for the original appeal no longer exists. Smoke detection was noted as being installed throughout the building as part of the appeal and not necessarily installed as a requirement. We would like to remove the appeal in full as the condition no longer applies and proved a fire alarm panel upgrade with code minimum detection throughout. |
Appeal Decision
Remove prior appeal (B-8, 2/10/99), and non-required smoke detection throughout: Granted as proposed.
The Administrative Appeal Board finds that the information submitted by the appellant demonstrates that the approved modifications or alternate methods are consistent with the intent of the code; do not lessen the health, safety, accessibility, life, fire safety or structural requirements; and that special conditions unique to this project make strict application of those code sections impractical.