Appeal 34886
Appeal Summary
Status: Decision Rendered
Appeal ID: 34886
Submission Date: 7/5/25 2:18 PM
Hearing Date: 7/16/25
Case #: B-1
Appeal Type: Building
Project Type: commercial
Building/Business Name: Unite Oregon
Appeal Involves: Alteration of an existing structure
Proposed use: Office & Daycare
Project Address: 1390 SE 122nd Ave
Appellant Name: Brian Kimura
LUR or Permit Application #: Permit 25-034046-CO
Stories: 2 Occupancy: B, E Construction Type: VB
Fire Sprinklers: Yes - Proposed E half of building
Plans Examiner/Inspector: Chanel Horn
Plan Submitted Option: pdf [File 1] [File 2]
Payment Option: electronic
Appeal Information Sheet
Appeal item 1
| Code Section | 1006.2.1, 1028 |
|---|---|
| Requires | The Oregon Structural Specialty Code (OSSC) generally requires all egress discharge to occur on the same lot as the building, terminating at a public way, unless otherwise approved. Crossing a separate tax lot for emergency egress is typically not allowed without combining the parcels or providing legal guarantees that preserve access in perpetuity. |
| Code Modification or Alternate Requested | Allow for Egress to utilize adjacent property (R274143, that is owned by the owner/tenant submitting this appeal) as the egress path to the public way. |
| Proposed Design | The tenant improvement at 1390 SE 122nd Ave is a commercial interior remodel. The Existing Building was built w/ the southern entry built over the property line. Due to interior layout and site constraints, one required emergency exit door from the rear of the tenant space will discharge across an adjacent, vacant lot at 1390 SE 122nd Ave (Tax Lot: 1S2E02BC 1900), which is: |
| Reason for alternative | Due to existing building entrance orientation, structural limitations, and existing egress from the basement, this egress path is the most viable and code-compliant route to a public way. Strict adherence to the requirement that egress remain on the same parcel would require structural changes or infeasible site work. To ensure permanent access, life safety, and code intent are met, the following measures will be implemented:
o The egress route is paved and finished with a slip-resistant surface
Documentation is provided demonstrating common ownership of both lots, ensuring continued control and maintenance of the egress path.
This appeal supports the intent of the OSSC by ensuring: |
Appeal item 2
| Code Section | chapter 3, 5, 10 |
|---|---|
| Requires | The code requires all accessory uses such as playgrounds or open areas serving a specific occupancy (such as Group E, educational/daycare) to be located on the same parcel or within the building site as defined under OSSC. OSSC generally treats separate tax lots as separate properties unless combined by lot consolidation or legal covenant. |
| Code Modification or Alternate Requested | Request to allow using southern adjacent property (R274143, that is owned by the owner/tenant submitting this appeal) as a playground supporting the daycare use at 1390 SE 122nd (R196775) TI. |
| Proposed Design | The proposed project is a childcare facility located at [Main Site Address], serving children under Group E occupancy. A dedicated outdoor playground is planned on an adjacent property at [Adjacent Lot Address], which is a separate tax lot under the same ownership. The playground will be: • Fenced, secured, and directly accessible via a gated path from the main building. We propose to treat the adjacent lot as part of the same building site for the purposes of occupancy, exiting, and accessory use. |
| Reason for alternative | The appeal is submitted to allow an outdoor play area required by Oregon DHS and licensing standards to be located on an adjacent parcel, while remaining compliant with health, safety, and code intent. Although the lots are legally distinct, the common ownership, direct access, and dedicated use support the functional integration of the playground with the primary occupancy. • A recorded Covenant for Shared Use and Maintenance will be filed, binding both parcels to a single operational purpose and restricting the playground’s use to the permitted facility. This appeal supports the intent of the OSSC by ensuring: |
Appeal item 3
| Code Section | Chapter 9, NFPA 24, • City of Portland Water Bureau and Fire Marshal Policies regarding private fire service mains crossing property lines |
|---|---|
| Requires | Fire sprinkler systems must be served by a dedicated fire service line routed entirely on the same legal lot as the protected building, or must be supported by a recorded easement or lot consolidation. Private fire mains typically must not cross a separate tax lot unless legally secured and reviewed by the Portland Fire Marshal and Water Bureau. |
| Code Modification or Alternate Requested | Allow for Fire Water Line to be supplied from SE Madison Ave and cross property R274143 (owned by the owner/tenant submitting this appeal). |
| Proposed Design | We propose routing a new private fire service main from SE Madison Street across an adjacent parcel under the same ownership to serve the building at property R196775. The water line will enter the adjacent parcel (R274143) from SE Madison Street, continue underground to a vault and backflow prevention assembly at the property line with the building parcel (Parcel B), and then enter the building. • Parcel A: R274143 – Entry point from SE Madison (low-traffic street) |
| Reason for alternative | Bringing the water line directly from SE 122nd Avenue—the nearest Water Bureau connection to Parcel B—would require trenching across the western half of SE 122nd, a high-volume arterial street, resulting in: • Significant traffic disruption and road closures Routing from SE Madison Street, which borders Parcel A (under the same ownership), allows the service line to be installed: To ensure full compliance with the intent of fire protection codes and City standards, the following are proposed:
o Pipe sizing, backflow prevention, and vault access
This appeal aligns with the intent of life safety and operational reliability by: |
Appeal Decision
Item 1: Access to Public Way with egress across property line with egress access / maintenance agreement: Granted provided the agreement is reviewed and approved by PP&D prior to recording.
Appellant must contact Chanel Horn (Chanel.Horn@portlandoregon.gov) for more information prior to writing the access agreement.
"The Administrative Appeal Board finds with the conditions noted, that the information submitted by the appellant demonstrates that the approved modifications or alternate methods are consistent with the intent of the code; do not lessen the health, safety, accessibility, life, fire safety or structural requirements; and that special conditions unique to this project make strict application of those code sections impractical.
Under City Code Chapter 24.10, you may appeal this decision to the Building Code Board of Appeal within 90 calendar days of the date this decision is published. For information on the appeals process, how to file a reconsideration, and how to appeal to the Building Code Board of Appeal, go to https://www.portland.gov/ppd/file-appeal/appeal-process or email PPDAppeals@portlandoregon.gov."