Appeal 35029
Appeal Summary
Status: DENIED
Appeal ID: 35029
Submission Date: 11/12/25 11:59 AM
Hearing Date: 11/25/25
Case #: 25-64
Appeal Type: Fire
Project Type: residential
Building/Business Name:
Appeal Involves: Erection of a new structure
Proposed use: Single Family Dwelling
Project Address: 2711 SE 103rd ave
Appellant Name: Jim Lashbaugh
LUR or Permit Application #: LUR US
Stories: 2 Occupancy: R-3 Construction Type: 5
Fire Sprinklers: No
Plans Examiner/Inspector: Dawn Krantz
Plan Submitted Option: pdf [File 1]
Payment Option: electronic
Appeal Information Sheet
Appeal item 1
| Code Section | OFC 503.1.1 |
|---|---|
| Requires | 503.1.1 Buildings and facilities. Approved fire apparatus access roads shall be provided for every facility building or portion of a building hereafter constructed or moved into or within the jurisdiction. The fire apparatus access road shall comply with the requirements of this section and shall extend to within 150 feet (45 720 mm) of all portions of the facility and all portions of the exterior walls of the first story of the building as measured by an approved route around the exterior of the building or facility. Exceptions:
1.1. The building is equipped throughout with an approved automatic sprinkler system installed in accordance with Section 903.3.1.1, 903.3.1.2 or 903.3.1.3.
|
| Code Modification or Alternate Requested | To allow the home, which is more than 150 ft from the fire apparatus access road to the farthest point of the structure, to be built without fire sprinklers. |
| Proposed Design | Our proposal includes using fire resistive siding and roofing, as well as 'NO PARKING' signs posted along the private driveway back to the unit, and an Emergency Access Easement over the sidewalk and private driveway back to the structure. |
| Reason for alternative | The distance to the farthest point of the structure at 2711 SE 103rd (Unit 4 on site plan) is only slightly over the 150' requirement (171.43 ft). We are asking for that to be considered sufficient, along with the proposals listed above, to provide equivalent protection to what the code requires. |
The administrative staff has not yet reviewed this appeal.