Appeal 35034
Appeal Summary
Status: Decision Rendered
Appeal ID: 35034
Submission Date: 11/21/25 12:47 PM
Hearing Date: 12/3/25
Case #: B-2
Appeal Type: Building
Project Type: commercial
Building/Business Name: Planet Fitness
Appeal Involves: other: risk classification
Proposed use: gym/health club
Project Address: 2650 NE MLK Jr Blvd
Appellant Name: Laura Lewallen
LUR or Permit Application #: Permit 25-044881-CO
Stories: 2 Occupancy: A-3 Construction Type: V-B
Fire Sprinklers: Yes - fully sprinklered NFPA 13
Plans Examiner/Inspector: John Cooley
Plan Submitted Option: pdf [File 1] [File 2]
Payment Option: electronic
Appeal Information Sheet
Appeal item 1
| Code Section | Chapter 24.85 Seismic Design Requirements for Existing Buildings |
|---|---|
| Requires | Table 24.85-A requires a structural analysis if there is change of the Relative Hazard Classification. The previous tenant and original building was M (Mercantile) per the OSSC Occupancy Classification and the proposed new tenant is a gymnasium. A gymnasium is typically an A-3 Assembly Occupancy. |
| Code Modification or Alternate Requested | Table 24.85-A requires a structural analysis if there is change of the Relative Hazard Classification. This appeal is to consider this particular tenant as a B occupancy rather than an A occupancy. A gymnasium is typically an A-3 Assembly occupancy. |
| Proposed Design | The purpose of this appeal is to request that the proposed Planet Fitness tenancy be classified as a Business (Group B) occupancy rather than an Assembly (A-3) occupancy. This request does not involve any changes to the building’s construction or life-safety systems; it solely concerns the appropriate interpretation of code and occupancy classification based on actual operational use. Although gymnasiums are often categorized as A-3 occupancies, the conditions typically associated with that classification—large group classes, gatherings, or assembly-type activities—do not exist within this Planet Fitness facility. Planet Fitness does not offer group fitness classes and does not contain large open rooms designed for assembly. Entry is limited to members only, eliminating the possibility of sudden, uncontrolled surges in occupancy that can occur in other assembly uses such as churches, meeting halls, or even retail stores during peak events.
|
| Reason for alternative | This appeal is to meet (if not exceed) the intent of the code by effectively lowering the original building occupant load it was designed for by 30% regardless the occupancy classification. Classification as a Business occupancy provides a complaint solution to occupy the current vacant building without triggering the extensive structural analysis and potential costly upgrades that could exceed the cost to pursue the project. Those upgrades are intended for other higher-loaded types of Assembly uses. |
Appeal Decision
Accept fitness club as Group B rather than Group A-3 assembly: Denied. Proposal does not provide equivalent fire and life safety.
Please note: The approved design occupant load of the building remains as calculated under appeal #35023 (approximately 285).
Pursuant to City Code Chapter 24.10, you may appeal this decision to the Building Code Board of Appeal within 90 calendar days of the date this decision is published. For information on the appeals process, how to file a reconsideration, and appealing to the Building Code Board of Appeal, go to https://www.portland.gov/ppd/file-appeal/appeal-process or email PPDAppeals@portlandoregon.gov.