Appeal 35078
Appeal Summary
Status: Hold pending payment of fees
Appeal ID: 35078
Submission Date: 1/20/26 12:47 PM
Hearing Date: 1/28/26
Case #: B-2
Appeal Type: Building
Project Type: commercial
Building/Business Name: Woolworth Building
Appeal Involves: Alteration of an existing structure
Proposed use: Business
Project Address: 1621 SW 1st Ave
Appellant Name: Chelsey Boreas
LUR or Permit Application #: Permit 25-102755--FA
Stories: 6 Occupancy: Business Construction Type: IB
Fire Sprinklers: Yes - Throughout
Plans Examiner/Inspector: Brian Quattlebaum
Plan Submitted Option: pdf [File 1]
Payment Option: electronic
Appeal Information Sheet
Appeal item 1
| Code Section | City of Portland Title 24.85.040 Change of Occupancy or Use |
|---|---|
| Requires | Multiple occupancy changes to a single building may be made under this section without triggering a seismic upgrade provided the cumulative changes do not result in the addition of more than 149 occupants with respect to the legal building occupancy as of October 1, 2004. |
| Code Modification or Alternate Requested | This appeal proposes that this building be permitted to add up to 10 percent more occupants with respect to the legal building occupancy as of October 1, 2004, before the seismic upgrade requirements mandated by section 24.85.040 |
| Proposed Design | The Woolworth Building is an existing office building that is part of the Park Square development in Portland, OR and consists of 6 stories of office with parking at ground level and 1 mezzanine level. This is an existing building constructed 1981. The full building is protected with an automatic fire sprinkler system and a voice annunciated fire alarm system. This appeal proposes that this building be permitted to add up to 10 percent more occupants with respect to the legal building occupancy as of October 1, 2024, before the seismic upgrade requirements mandated by section 24.85.040 are applicable. |
| Reason for alternative | The 149-occupant load trigger is unfairly burdensome on large buildings. The cost to seismically retrofit a this building is out of proportion to the relatively small addition of occupants when the limit is 149. |
The administrative staff has not yet reviewed this appeal.